<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DigiManiac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digimaniac.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digimaniac.net</link>
	<description>We review the digital World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 07:18:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What digital camera should my family get? by His</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4486</link>
		<dc:creator>His</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 07:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4486</guid>
		<description>Canon Powershot SD750
small, pretty, cheap... 7.1 megapixels :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon Powershot SD750<br />
small, pretty, cheap&#8230; 7.1 megapixels <img src='http://digimaniac.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What digital camera should my family get? by SMiLEY!(:</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4485</link>
		<dc:creator>SMiLEY!(:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 06:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4485</guid>
		<description>a Casio Exilim. i have one and they&#039;re compact, small, 7.2 megapixels and rarely ever has errors.
purchase it for about $140 US at a bestbuy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a Casio Exilim. i have one and they&#8217;re compact, small, 7.2 megapixels and rarely ever has errors.<br />
purchase it for about $140 US at a bestbuy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What digital camera should my family get? by NAB</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4484</link>
		<dc:creator>NAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4484</guid>
		<description>I personally like Canon cameras, and we own 2 Canon digicams, (PowerShot A610 and an A620), and a few of their 35mms. They are dependable, reputable and very user friendly!  I like the fact that Canon (and I believe Kodak), use sd/mmc (memory card). But if you want to buy extra memory to take pictures with, sd/mmc are much more affordable than other media memory formats. If you find/buy a camera that happens to take video, get extra memory cards. 2gb sd/mmc cards are getting to be cheaper..

Here&#039;s a list of things or tips to consider when looking for a great family camera---

1). Requires regular batteries or not? There are many cameras that all you do is recharge, (like a cellphone), the camera. I like cameras that use your basic AA batteries. You can buy rechargeable AA batteries, and buy regular ones in a pinch anywhere, should you find your camera without power, instead of being without a camera to use while it&#039;s hooked up being recharged. (What happens if you need to replace the internal built-in lithium ion battery? Might be costly to replace and not easy to find). It&#039;s true that digicameras use up disposable batteries quickly. But you can buy rechargeable ones and they last a long time. It should be a must to buy rechargeable batteries (with it’s charger), There are some AA (stick with the name brands), that now recharges in an hour, or even less! (Remember to figure in the cost to buy rechargeable AA/AAA battery and battery recharger).

2). An optical viewfinder is very useful for those times when it&#039;s difficult to see your subject on your screen, and helps conserve power of your camera. This feature seems to be important to some, (me included), but to others, not necessary. (This is where IS [Image Stabilization] comes in. Helpful if your camera does not have an optical vierfinder.)

3). Don&#039;t get sucked in by the more MP (megapixels [10 and above]), the camera has, the better. It is not always the case. 5-6 mp is sufficient for most.

4). Optical zoom of at least 3-4x. Don&#039;t be fooled by a high digital zoom number. Opitical is what you&#039;re looking for.

5). IS (image stabilization) and face detection? I grew up taking pictures using 110 film and 35mm cameras. They never had it, I grew to compensate adjusting ISO, film speed, manually focusing my subject, lighting, and a steady hand. This is a personal choice for what an individual wants.

6). Camera size: Compact or subcompact? You might compromise functions and options when you go with a small and sleek camera. This is also a personal choice.

I&#039;m not familiar with merchants or shops there where you live, (I&#039;m assumming you&#039;re not from the States), that are well known for selling digital cameras.  So you may want to start with visiting one of those places.  Bear in minds some of the things I mentioned when looking for a camera.  The salesperson may ask you the same questions.  That way they can show you which camera you might consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like Canon cameras, and we own 2 Canon digicams, (PowerShot A610 and an A620), and a few of their 35mms. They are dependable, reputable and very user friendly!  I like the fact that Canon (and I believe Kodak), use sd/mmc (memory card). But if you want to buy extra memory to take pictures with, sd/mmc are much more affordable than other media memory formats. If you find/buy a camera that happens to take video, get extra memory cards. 2gb sd/mmc cards are getting to be cheaper..</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a list of things or tips to consider when looking for a great family camera&#8212;</p>
<p>1). Requires regular batteries or not? There are many cameras that all you do is recharge, (like a cellphone), the camera. I like cameras that use your basic AA batteries. You can buy rechargeable AA batteries, and buy regular ones in a pinch anywhere, should you find your camera without power, instead of being without a camera to use while it&#8217;s hooked up being recharged. (What happens if you need to replace the internal built-in lithium ion battery? Might be costly to replace and not easy to find). It&#8217;s true that digicameras use up disposable batteries quickly. But you can buy rechargeable ones and they last a long time. It should be a must to buy rechargeable batteries (with it’s charger), There are some AA (stick with the name brands), that now recharges in an hour, or even less! (Remember to figure in the cost to buy rechargeable AA/AAA battery and battery recharger).</p>
<p>2). An optical viewfinder is very useful for those times when it&#8217;s difficult to see your subject on your screen, and helps conserve power of your camera. This feature seems to be important to some, (me included), but to others, not necessary. (This is where IS [Image Stabilization] comes in. Helpful if your camera does not have an optical vierfinder.)</p>
<p>3). Don&#8217;t get sucked in by the more MP (megapixels [10 and above]), the camera has, the better. It is not always the case. 5-6 mp is sufficient for most.</p>
<p>4). Optical zoom of at least 3-4x. Don&#8217;t be fooled by a high digital zoom number. Opitical is what you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>5). IS (image stabilization) and face detection? I grew up taking pictures using 110 film and 35mm cameras. They never had it, I grew to compensate adjusting ISO, film speed, manually focusing my subject, lighting, and a steady hand. This is a personal choice for what an individual wants.</p>
<p>6). Camera size: Compact or subcompact? You might compromise functions and options when you go with a small and sleek camera. This is also a personal choice.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with merchants or shops there where you live, (I&#8217;m assumming you&#8217;re not from the States), that are well known for selling digital cameras.  So you may want to start with visiting one of those places.  Bear in minds some of the things I mentioned when looking for a camera.  The salesperson may ask you the same questions.  That way they can show you which camera you might consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What digital camera should my family get? by starrose</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4483</link>
		<dc:creator>starrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4483</guid>
		<description>PowerShot SD1100 IS off ebay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PowerShot SD1100 IS off ebay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What digital camera should my family get? by 1ll1m1nat0r</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4482</link>
		<dc:creator>1ll1m1nat0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/what-digital-camera-should-my-family-get/#comment-4482</guid>
		<description>I would have this:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000PH5IWI/026-5854203-4974830?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=shape4-21&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creativeASIN=B000PH5IWI

As i have the predecessor and it is brilliant. Well worth the money!!!

Or:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000V3ICJ2/026-5854203-4974830?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=shape4-21&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creativeASIN=B000V3ICJ2

Hope it helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000PH5IWI/026-5854203-4974830?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=shape4-21&#038;linkCode=xm2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creativeASIN=B000PH5IWI" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000PH5IWI/026-5854203-4974830?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=shape4-21&#038;linkCode=xm2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creativeASIN=B000PH5IWI</a></p>
<p>As i have the predecessor and it is brilliant. Well worth the money!!!</p>
<p>Or:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000V3ICJ2/026-5854203-4974830?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=shape4-21&#038;linkCode=xm2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creativeASIN=B000V3ICJ2" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000V3ICJ2/026-5854203-4974830?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=shape4-21&#038;linkCode=xm2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creativeASIN=B000V3ICJ2</a></p>
<p>Hope it helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A: How do you remove scratches on a digital camera? by sugarbuny</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/qa-how-do-you-remove-scratches-on-a-digital-camera/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>sugarbuny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 04:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/qa-how-do-you-remove-scratches-on-a-digital-camera/#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>it depends...on the camera and where the scratches are.
if the scratches are on the lens, youre kindof in trouble. but there are some cameras where you can actually change the case, if yours is not one of those, you cant really help it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it depends&#8230;on the camera and where the scratches are.<br />
if the scratches are on the lens, youre kindof in trouble. but there are some cameras where you can actually change the case, if yours is not one of those, you cant really help it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How difficult is it to connect a digital video recorder to my TV? by sunshine</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/how-difficult-is-it-to-connect-a-digital-video-recorder-to-my-tv/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 05:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/how-difficult-is-it-to-connect-a-digital-video-recorder-to-my-tv/#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>I do a lot of screencasts for my educational video podcast, and the one I&#039;ve found to be great and easy to use is Total Screen Recorder. The screen recording is rendered as .AVI / WMV / SWF / FLV. 
Just $25 to get a full version or you could get a free trial version here:
http://www.totalscreenrecorder.com/download.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do a lot of screencasts for my educational video podcast, and the one I&#8217;ve found to be great and easy to use is Total Screen Recorder. The screen recording is rendered as .AVI / WMV / SWF / FLV.<br />
Just $25 to get a full version or you could get a free trial version here:<br />
<a href="http://www.totalscreenrecorder.com/download.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.totalscreenrecorder.com/download.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you photograph stars and the moon with a digital camera? by Keith P</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/how-do-you-photograph-stars-and-the-moon-with-a-digital-camera/#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 04:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/how-do-you-photograph-stars-and-the-moon-with-a-digital-camera/#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>Open it up for the full 10 seconds. For that short a time, you will not need to track the stars with a motor drive.

Note that the full moon is MUCH brighter than even the brightest star, so a 10-sec exposure of the full moon will be overexposed. (You&#039;ll have to experiment to determine the exact exposure for the Moon; it depends on the sensitivity of the CCD inside the camera).

For stars, you will probably not get much at 10 seconds, unless you are at a very dark-sky site (rural area). But it&#039;s worth a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open it up for the full 10 seconds. For that short a time, you will not need to track the stars with a motor drive.</p>
<p>Note that the full moon is MUCH brighter than even the brightest star, so a 10-sec exposure of the full moon will be overexposed. (You&#8217;ll have to experiment to determine the exact exposure for the Moon; it depends on the sensitivity of the CCD inside the camera).</p>
<p>For stars, you will probably not get much at 10 seconds, unless you are at a very dark-sky site (rural area). But it&#8217;s worth a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a good place to have digital media blown up to poster size with out distortion? by Dr. Sam</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/what-is-a-good-place-to-have-digital-media-blown-up-to-poster-size-with-out-distortion/#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/what-is-a-good-place-to-have-digital-media-blown-up-to-poster-size-with-out-distortion/#comment-4403</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll vote with DigiDoc.  For very reliable, professional work, I trust Miller&#039;s Mpix.com.  http://www.mpix.com.  They have quite a variety of print sizes available that would allow you to get a suitable enlargement from almost any image format.

They will do 20x30 prints starting at $25.  Go to their site and click on the help pages to find out about resolution.  They recommend 250 ppi, but will go as low as 100 ppi.  This means you can make a 20x30 from a 6MP image (2000x3000) but a bigger is better.  If you want poster size, this would be okay, because you aren&#039;t going to be viewing them from 16&quot; away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll vote with DigiDoc.  For very reliable, professional work, I trust Miller&#8217;s Mpix.com.  <a href="http://www.mpix.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mpix.com</a>.  They have quite a variety of print sizes available that would allow you to get a suitable enlargement from almost any image format.</p>
<p>They will do 20&#215;30 prints starting at $25.  Go to their site and click on the help pages to find out about resolution.  They recommend 250 ppi, but will go as low as 100 ppi.  This means you can make a 20&#215;30 from a 6MP image (2000&#215;3000) but a bigger is better.  If you want poster size, this would be okay, because you aren&#8217;t going to be viewing them from 16&#8243; away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a good place to have digital media blown up to poster size with out distortion? by Jim M</title>
		<link>http://digimaniac.net/what-is-a-good-place-to-have-digital-media-blown-up-to-poster-size-with-out-distortion/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digimaniac.net/what-is-a-good-place-to-have-digital-media-blown-up-to-poster-size-with-out-distortion/#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve gotten really high quality 20x30s from ElCo Labs. And for only $9.95.

I was skeptical.  But they&#039;re full quality photographic prints on high quality paper.

Give &#039;em a try.
http://www.elcocolor.com/poster_special.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotten really high quality 20x30s from ElCo Labs. And for only $9.95.</p>
<p>I was skeptical.  But they&#8217;re full quality photographic prints on high quality paper.</p>
<p>Give &#8216;em a try.<br />
<a href="http://www.elcocolor.com/poster_special.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.elcocolor.com/poster_special.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

